Japan's Controversial Fingerprinting Policy Enrages Foreigners

Japan's controversial decision to take fingerprints and mugshots of all foreigners entering the country over the age of 16 has provoked outrage, especially among foreign residents.

About 80 protestors turned toward the ministry building and shouted in unison their opposition to the new policy, which requires all but a handful of foreigners to have their fingerprints and face photos taken to gain entry into Japan.

Representatives of human rights groups, labor unions, foreigners' groups and individuals spoke out against the system -- similar to the US-VISIT policy operating in the United States since 2004, but also targeting residents and not just tourists -- calling it, among other things, "racist," "xenophobic," "retrogressive" and "an invasion of human rights and privacy."

(Yokoso means Welcome in Japanese)
"It's an expression of Japanese xenophobia. Japan is using this system as a tool to control foreigners. For the past few years, the government has been associating foreigners with things like crime and terrorism," said Sonoko Kawakami, campaign coordinator for Amnesty International Japan, which organized Tuesday's demonstration.

Lim Young-Ki, a representative of the Korean Youth Association in Japan, pointed out how ethnic Koreans had fought for decades until the 2000 abolition of fingerprinting on Alien Registration Certificates only to see the process revived through the back door now.

"This system is ostensibly an anti-terrorism measure, but it is extremely harmful to individuals and only applying the system to foreigners shows a lack of consideration for foreigners' human rights. Even though the system of fingerprinting foreigners was completely abolished in April 2000, it's infuriating that the Japanese government has reinstated this practice and this entry inspection system," Lim said, reading a statement issued by his organization. "We want to use this demonstration to call on the Japanese government to promptly redress this system obligating foreigners to provide their fingerprints and face photos whenever they enter the country."

Catherine Campbell of the National Union of General Workers Nanbu, whose ranks contain many foreigners, echoed a similar line. "This is a big step backward and I really think it's sad," she said.

Another foreign woman who identified herself only as Jennifer said she is a permanent resident, having lived in Japan for 38 years and with a Japanese husband and Japanese national children. She spoke about having previously provided authorities with her fingerprint and face photo while taking out and updating her Alien Registration Certificate.

"They already have my photo and my fingerprint...many times over," she said. "This step is quite unnecessary."
But an official from the Justice Ministry's Immigration Bureau dismissed the protestors' claims.

"This system was introduced to protect the lives and safety of citizens by preventing terrorism. There were rational reasons and necessities in introducing the system, which was approved by the Diet," Yasuhiro Togo of the Immigration Bureau said, adding that the methods of fingerprinting differ from the abolished Alien Registration Certificate system. "The aim of taking fingerprints is different -- we're fighting against terrorism -- and we will not be forcing people to put their fingers into ink as used to be the case. The fingerprints will all be taken and stored electronically."
Changes to the immigration law in May last year allowed for the collection of biometric data. Now, except for special permanent residents -- who are largely people born and bred in Japan -- diplomats, children under 16 and others the government deems can be excluded, any non-Japanese entering the country must provide the fingerprints from the index fingers on both hands and a photo of their face before they can be permitted to enter the country.
The government says the new system is aimed at combating terrorism, but has also said it will provide data to crime-fighting authorities upon request. The Immigration Bureau's Togo said such information would be handled in accordance with the Private Information Protection Law. He added that information collected by immigration authorities would not be handed over to foreign governments.
Source: Mainichi
Fingerprinting and photographing of all foreigners who enter Japan, except for a limited number of people such as special permanent residents and visitors under the age of 16, began at airports and ports across Japan on Tuesday. From now on, foreigners entering Japan need to leave their fingerprints and photographs at Narita Airport:

Talk about Japan's Controversial Fingerprinting Policy Enrages Foreigners
Talk
Share Link
Embed Video
Add Image
0/200




Reload
Kevin
3 months ago
What's wrong with you people. I forgot they even took my finger prints. It just gives them data about you. And it doesn't do anything to you.
This is the dummest complaint I've read all week.


-1 likes
Anthony Brenton
2 year ago
I've noticed a couple of typograpical errors in my post above:'Let the Japanese government...learn the HARD way'.....'Let THEM be denied'.....'But who listens to philosophers ANY more'.Sorry.By the way, I visited Japan in late 2006 for a WEBBS (World Elite Black Belt Society) annual congress. The local people were extremely pleasant, but one had a sense that they were rather subdued...a relic of their feudal past, I suspect. At that time, they didn't have a completely mad government. One can only hope that mass fingerprinting is a passing phase.In my last post, I mentioned past Japanese aggression with regard to WWII and China, but left out Korea. My apologies to the Koreans - they also suffered. Will Japanese governments never learn?


xand
2 year ago
i agree with liberal to the extent that The japanese " have always been extremely xenophobic, extremely introverted, and hate foreigners" also how dont they have rights in america ? i know a some japanese ppl and none of them told me they couldnt go somewhere because the were foreigners.


Anthony Brenton
2 year ago
John Yao (first comment) might or might not be an idiot. I wouldn't know, but his remarks are irrelevant. There are important issues concerning universal human rights which I thought or perhaps hoped Japanese governments were starting to respect.Sadly, they aren't, and they're using the presence of world terrorism (the causes of which have absolutely nothing to do with them, so far as I am aware)to exert control over absolutely everything in their country (as if they weren't already).Yes, the United States is guilty of this abusetoo. It's one thing to check the fingerprints of foreign visitors against a criminal database, but why store them? And the UK is slowly (and slyly) moving the same way. And these people will succeed unless people worldwide stop being complacent.As one of the earlier commentators has hinted, we should boycott all Japanese goods. Let the Japanese government, trying as it is to justify fingerprinting by claiming it is for the safety of foreigners and locals alike, learn the had way.According to the Japan Times, the Prime Minister wishes to encourage foreign tourism.Let be denied. Don't buy Japanese cars, tools or machinery. Don't use or buy their consumer electronics or computers (they're not cheap anyway). Buy Taiwanese or Chinese instead.Remind the Japanese that their involvement in World War II was initiated by them, as were their historic attacks on China. Remind them that their obsession with martial arts, is an obsession with skills that came from outside Japan (India and China)...and were practised in Okinawa and the Ryukyu Islands (of which Okinawa is the largest), before the islands became a prefecture of the Japanese mainland. I know...I practise jujutsu (from which judo is derived) and am also a karate instructor.I differ slightly from 'Liberal' above in that recording the fingerprints only of Japanese people is to victimise the people, and not their government. Currently, they are also protesting against the measures...so why alienate them? Economic measures by way of individual boycott will work if only people will act.Certainly the present British government won't protest...they're so right-wing they're almost invisible.Actually, as a philosopher, I have much to say on the need to impose limits upon the extent to which governments can act, and upon the doubtful status of law. But who listens to philosopers and more?


Liberal
2 year ago
Probably, like brazil, all other countries should exclusively make ONLY japanese give their finger prints and make a separate line for them at immigration counter.Japan needs the world, more than the world needs Japan.If its for cheap manufactured goods; there is China.If its for Software; there is India.And if its for precision instruments like Heidelberg printing press, there is Germany.Who needs Japan?Nobody. They have always been extremely xenophobic, extremely introverted, and hate foreigners.Let them rot in their own small country.


any
2 year ago
doesnt usa do this either?


Shin Wang
2 year ago
HAHA I stayed in Japan and left before they could fingerprint me! YAY! No japanese junk mail selling me penis enhaceing pills. Seriously if your a foreigner u have no rights in japan. And conversely japanese have no right here in America, please remember that.


Ezekiel
2 year ago
I honestly don't see where all the hubbub is coming from. When I enter the country I get my picture taken and a fingerprint, which will take a few hours of the decades I'll spend there. If this makes the Japanese government feel more secure and maybe even catches some criminals trying to pass quietly from country to country, then hey, a little bit of time won't hurt me.


-1 likes
Aromis
2 year ago
They said in the article that certain people would be excluded from having to give fingerprints and have their photos taken. Being a little more specific on that would help to clarify who else they want to let slide right into their country.


UNKNOWN
2 year ago
JOHN YAO IS AN IDIOT


Luminoth
2 year ago
I am not surprised. The Japanese refused to talk with the rest of the world until America pried their lock from them. I promise you that they are the original haters of foreigners, not the Europeans.


coop
2 year ago
It could be easy to frame someone with there own finger print. Being a foreigner wouldn't help either.


Mike
2 year ago
Actually, it really isn't about "keeping out minorities". They are trying to keep more tabs on foreigners (this includes white people). I wouldn't say the Japanese "Bend over backwards" for Caucasians. I've had two friends who have visited Japan, both white. Several businesses refused to serve them because they were foreign... I wouldn't call that "bending over backwards"


Casey
2 year ago
I have to agree with Wes. It has nothing to do with "if you've got nothing to hide...", it's about an individuals right to privacy and free movement.


Martin
2 year ago
if you have something to hide you should worry, civil liberty has nothing to do with this issue. Japan has every right to use these minimal measures. I'm a gajin, I will gladly produce my index finger to continue visiting this stunning country. Now, if the rest if the foreigners don't like it...i'm sure the authorities will not block your way to the airport


Wes
2 year ago
Both previous comments are misguided, and "Rick" is simply retarded. Our human rights to privacy and free movement are in jeopardy the world over- which was the point of the protests and info in the article. The USA is almost always on the abusive end of the stick... now Welcome Japan. Tyranny is multi-cultural.


that_guy
2 year ago
hey good for the people, good for the protesters, good for the government.... I'm still gonna go there, and I'm still gonna have a great time... that is if i dont end up in jail in thailand =S hahaha who wants to come with


Rick
2 year ago
If they don't like it, they can leave Japan. Hell America needs to do it to protect ourselves. Then maybe stuff like 9/11 won't happen.


John Yao
2 year ago
Japanese people are the biggest puppets of caucasians. If you look at all the European countries and America, they are trying to make it more difficult for minorities (hint: non-whites) to get citizenship or visitation rights to their country. Why should Asian country bend over backwards for these white people unless they been white-washed and worship these fools.
























