Weird Stuff
Straight out of Asia!

 
Newest Popular Top Searches

Best of

Festivals

Celebrities

Sexless 10 Years Not Enough for Divorce Cause in Korea

May 11, 2009
3341 Views
6 comments

A South Korean court rejected a divorce filing by a husband who never had sex with his wife during their 10 years of marriage, citing the wife's willingness to have normal sexual relations.
korean couple

The couple, married in May 1999, attempted to have sex early on in the marriage but failed for a variety of reasons. Since then, they maintained a sexless relationship, according to the filing to the Seoul Family Court.

The unidentified husband, 37, told his parents in 2007 about their situation. After the disclosure, the relationship between his wife and his other family members turned sour.

In August 2007, the husband filed a divorce suit with the court, claiming his wife refused to have sex with him for no justifiable reason, and her lavish spending had worsened the family's financial condition.

However, the court said there was no evidence to prove that the sexless relationship was the wife's fault. ``It's true that the couple maintained a sexless relationship for a long time, but we found no evidence backing the husband's allegation that she refused to have sex without any justifiable reason.''

The court added, ``Despite the sexless life, the husband did not complain until January 2007, and since then, has not provided any physical or periodical opportunity for his wife to normalize their relations. Also, she has shown a strong desire to restore relations.''

Photo from: Eyeofstanley
Source: Koreatimes

Talk about Sexless 10 Years Not Enough for Divorce Cause in Korea
Talk
Share Link
Embed Video
Add Image
0/200



Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code

Expand all  | 

Pix
10 months ago
Hey, come on ... who the hell lives even half that long without sex?
1 likes


><
1 year ago
he should just cheat . then she will leave him


what??
1 year ago
KV: are you insane?? do you realize this==at this is a photo?? Models??
2 likes


KV
1 year ago
Monetary damages I meant
-2 likes


KV
1 year ago
Look at the guy in the photo: it is amply clear why the girl would not want to have sex with that dirt bag. The judge should award mentary damages to the wife + the right to get sex outside. UGLY.
-2 likes


tammy
1 year ago
haha. if the husband really wanted a divorce he should have used other reasons instead of the absence of sex in the marriage.



[X]
Saw some hot news or videos? Suggest a link!
your name:
paste link to cool asian entertainment news: